News
Romanian DPA fines the lack of cooperation with the supervisory authority
The Romanian Data Protection Authority ("Romanian DPA") has recently sanctioned three entities (two private companies and a homeowners association) for lack of cooperation with the supervisory authority, imposing on these entities administrative fines of EUR 2,000 (twice), respectively EUR 3,000. All three sanctions were announced during October 2020 on the website of the Romanian DPA.

All sanctioned entities failed to provide the Romanian DPA with access to the requested information, which was necessary for the performance of the investigative duties of the supervisory authority. The fines are grounded on Article 83(5), letter (e) of the GDPR.
In the case of one of the private companies, the investigation started as a result of several petitioners having informed the Romanian DPA on the fact that they have received on their personal telephone numbers, via short message service (SMS), commercial messages promoting the services of a website owned by the legal entity, without their consent.
As concerns the homeowners association, the investigation started following a complaint where the petitioner claimed that he/she received no response to the request submitted to the respective homeowners association.
The Romanian DPA has not revealed the details of the investigation carried out in respect of the third sanctioned private company.
In all these three cases, with a view to perform the assessment of the facts, the Romanian DPA has send requests for additional information and explanations to the investigated entities. The sanctioned entities failed to respond to the requests of the Romanian DPA or failed to deliver all requested information/documentation.
It goes without saying that these GDPR fines are not of the type that we were used to see being imposed by the Romanian DPA - most of them being either for insufficient implementation of security measures to protect personal data or for non-observance of some of the GDPR data processing principles.
While all these sanctions are definitely based on the failure to provide access to information and documents in violation of Article 58(1) of the GDPR, the public announcements on the authority website refer rather to breaches of (or failure to comply with) corrective measures and not orders issued based on the investigative powers of the authority.
Besides the administrative fines, the Romanian DPA ordered once more to the sanctioned entities to provide the missing information/documents, the request being again presented as being a corrective measure.
It seems that the authority targeted to raise awareness among controllers and processors that it is in their best interest to provide the requested data in investigation contexts, and that cooperation with the supervisory authority is not optional.
All these measures – as well as the fact that there were three such sanctions within one month - signal to us that the Romanian DPA is open to raise the standards when it comes to dealing with data protection topics and cooperation with the supervisory authority.
Article provided by: Adelina Iftime Blagean and Nina Lazar (Wolf Theiss, Romania)
Discover more about INPLP, the INPLP-Members and the GDPR-FINE database
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010