News
Transparency, personal data and the proposed reform in Mexico.
Mexico's approach to personal data protection operates through distinct frameworks for the public and private sectors. The Federal Law on Protection of Personal Data Held by Private Parties (LFPDPPP ), established in 2010, governs private entities without reform to date. The public sector is regulated by the General Law on Protection of Personal Data Held by Obligated Subjects (LGPDPPSO1), in effect since 2017. The National Institute of Transparency, Access to Information, and Personal Data Protection (INAI1) ensures compliance in the private sector, while state-level bodies, constitutionally autonomous, guarantee enforcement in the public sector.
However, ongoing discussions emphasize the need to reform and possibly unify these frameworks to create a more streamlined and coherent regulatory environment for personal data protection. The potential dissolution of the INAI, as proposed in a constitutional reform, raises concerns. Such a move could disrupt efforts to modernize and harmonize data protection laws, creating uncertainty about the future of transparency and data protection in Mexico.
Guarantor Bodies in Mexico
Mexico’s personal data protection and access to information are overseen by two key bodies: the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information, and Personal Data Protection (INAI) and Constitutionally Autonomous State Public Bodies. The INAI primarily regulates the private sector under the Federal Law on Protection of Personal Data Held by Private Parties (LFPDPPP), while the state bodies oversee compliance within the public sector under the General Law on Protection of Personal Data Held by Obligated Subjects (LGPDPPSO). Together, these institutions ensure adherence to data protection laws and provide a system for appeals and oversight.
Normative Frameworks in Data Protection
Mexico employs distinct legal frameworks for the private and public sectors regarding data protection. The LFPDPPP, established in 2010, governs the private sector, detailing the rights of data subjects and the obligations of data controllers. The INAI supplements this law with regulations and guidelines. The public sector, on the other hand, is regulated by the LGPDPPSO, enacted in 2017, with its enforcement guided by state autonomous bodies. There is an ongoing discussion about reforming or unifying these frameworks into a single national law to simplify regulatory obligations. Such a reform could harmonize Mexico’s data protection standards with international benchmarks like the EU’s GDPR, potentially enhancing its appeal for foreign investment by offering a stable and robust regulatory environment.
Initiative of "Extinction of Bodies with Duplication of Functions"
On February 5, 2024, a significant reform proposal aimed at streamlining the government’s administrative structure was presented and approved. Titled "Extinction of Bodies with Duplication of Functions," this initiative proposes the dissolution of several autonomous bodies, including the INAI, arguing that their functions are redundant. The proposal suggests transferring the INAI’s responsibilities to existing government departments, aiming to enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs. However, this centralization raises concerns about the potential impact on the independent oversight of transparency and data protection, which are crucial for maintaining public trust and regulatory integrity.
Impact of this Reform
The reform has substantial implications across social, economic, and business domains. Socially, the INAI has played a pivotal role in safeguarding citizens’ rights to access information and protect personal data. Its dissolution could undermine public trust in governmental institutions by limiting individuals’ ability to monitor the handling of public information and data protection. Economically, the absence of an independent body like the INAI could create regulatory instability, discouraging foreign investment due to uncertainties about Mexico’s commitment to upholding international data protection standards. As personal data becomes an increasingly valuable asset in the global economy, the centralization of oversight functions may be perceived as a risk, potentially leading to reduced investment or the relocation of operations. The reform could also negatively impact Mexico’s business climate, as transparency and accountability are critical factors for investors concerned about corruption and governance risks.
Expectations
The elimination of the INAI represents a significant institutional shift that could impact trust among citizens and investors. Given the potential consequences, it is plausible that future administrations may revisit this reform. Regardless of the immediate outcomes, there is an expectation that Mexico will eventually need to modernize its data protection framework to align with international standards and meet the demands of the digital era. Maintaining a strong culture of transparency, accountability, and privacy protection remains essential, as these are fundamental rights that should be preserved and reinforced..
Article provided by INPLP members: José Antonio Arochi, Verónica Siten and Montserrat Landaverde (Arochi & Lindner, Mexico)
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- November 2024
- Oktober 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- Juli 2024
- Juni 2024
- Mai 2024
- April 2024
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010