News
Constitutional Court: The Criteria for Access to Traffic Data Too Loose
Slovenia’s Constitutional Court found the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA) enabling the prosecution (police) to access and seize traffic data (data about the circumstances of a communication) to be disproportionate and therefore in violation of the constitutionally guaranteed freedom to communication privacy. The Court set a one-year period in which the Parliament is to amend the CPA accordingly.
The relevant CPA provisions allowed for a criminal court to issue a subpoena to the telecommunication or information-society provider, forcing them to send relevant data about a certain communication (i.e., traffic data; never the contents of the communication) to the police or/and prosecution, if such data was necessary (“need to be acquired”) for the discovery, prevention, or proof of a criminal act. The subpoena could relate not only to the communication of the suspect of a criminal act but also to the communication made by the criminal act’s victim or by a person whose communication could reveal the suspect’s location.
According to the CPA, the subpoena could have been granted in case of a “reason to suspect” that a criminal act was carried out or is being carried out or is being prepared or organized. There was a list of criminal acts in relation to which the subpoena could have been granted. In addition, the CPA provided for the possibility of real-time traffic data relaying/broadcasting if a criminal act in question was punishable by more than a year’s imprisonment or if the owner of the communication device in question agreed to it.
The Constitutional Court observed that the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia is rather strict when it comes to the derogation of one’s communication privacy. It also stressed out that in certain cases traffic data might provide even deeper insight into someone’s life, habits and relations than the contents of the communication itself. Therefore, in the Court’s view, the provisions in question failed to pass the constitutional test of proportionality. Namely, the Court found that:
- the required standard of “reason to suspect”, as opposed to the probable cause, was too broad, meaning that subpoena could have been used against many persons, including the ones absolutely not connected to the criminal act,
- there were neither limitations with regard to the time period for which it was possible to request the traffic data nor any criteria to ascertain that time period,
- since, in line with the ECHR and the CJEU jurisprudence, the derogation of communication privacy should only be allowed for the most severe criminal acts, hence the catalogue of the criminal acts in the CPA that could trigger the subpoena was too broad.
The relevant CPA derogation by the Constitutional Court was not the first one in the field of communication privacy. Sadly, here the Parliament and the Government seem to have a particularly hard time striking a balance between (the legitimate goal of) fighting crime and respecting people’s constitutional and convention rights.
Article provided by INPLP member: Boris Kozlevcar (JK Group d.o.o. / JK Group ltd, Slovenia)
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- April 2024
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010