News
Copenhagen-based law firm fined for failing to implement basic security measures
A Copenhagen-based law firm has just been fined DKK 500,000, approx. EURO 67,150, for failing to implement basic security measures when setting up remote access to the firm's IT systems containing personal data of a particularly sensitive nature. Furthermore, the law firm has been reported to the police.

Hacker attack
The Copenhagen-based law firm was hit by a hacker attack in 2020, where its IT systems lacked "very basic security measures."
The hacker attack appears to be a ransomware attack, with the Danish Data Protection Authority explaining that the hackers not only gained access, but also "encrypted the law firm's servers, which contained information about the firm's clients and counterparties.".
This created a serious risk that the hackers could gain access to personal data of a particularly sensitive nature.
Lack of basic security measures
In systems containing a large number of personal data of a particularly sensitive nature, where compromise would pose a high risk to the rights of data subjects, the controller must have specifically qualified security measures in place to ensure that unauthorized access to personal data does not occur.
Thus, when creating remote accesses to such IT systems, verification measures, such as multifactor logins, must be implemented.
In this context, the Danish Data Protection Authority directly states that "Law firms by their nature process a lot of data which require special protection. In this case, lawyers lacked basic security measures, which unfortunately meant that, among other things, clients' data were compromised. You cannot protect yourself 100% against hacker attacks, but GDPR rules require you to make an effort to avoid what corresponds to the risk."
Fine and report to police
The Danish Data Protection Authority always carries out a specific assessment of the seriousness of the case, pursuant to Article 83(2) of the GDPR, when assessing which sanction is to be considered appropriate.
By assessing that a fine should be imposed, the Danish Data Protection Authority has considered that the law firm had not implemented the minimum-security measures expected when using remote access to systems which, if compromised, would pose a high risk to the rights of data subjects.
Additionally, the Danish Data Protection Authority considered, inter alia, the nature and gravity of the infringement and the requirement of the GDPR that a fine in each case must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
The Danish Data Protection Authority has decided to fine the law firm DKK 500,000, approx. EURO 67,150, which in a Danish context is in the higher end of fines regarding GDPR breaches and to report the case to the police.
The largest fine so far was DKK 10 million, which was imposed on the Danish bank Danske Bank in April 2022 for failing to delete personal data in accordance with the GDPR regulation.
It is interesting to see such a precedent for data security requirements for law firms, which by their very nature process a great deal of personal data covered by the GDPR.
Article provided by INPLP member: Claas Thöle (advores Advokater & Rechtsanwälte, Denmark)
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010