News
“Another breach in the wall” – the Polish DPA’s views regarding data security and notifying data breaches under the GDPR
In the ever-evolving landscape of data protection and privacy regulations, organizations must remain vigilant in upholding the security of the personal data they handle. A recent decision issued by the Polish DPA underscores this critical aspect, as the Polish DPA imposed an administrative fine exceeding PLN 47,000 (approx. € 10,000) due to implementing inadequate technical and organizational measures for safeguarding personal data and not notifying the authority about the data breach.
Facts
After receiving a third-party tip regarding a controller's loss of electronic records due to a ransomware attack—which included employee personal data and information on security officers employed by the Company—the Polish DPA, they sought further clarification from the controller. In response, the controller acknowledged a ransomware attack that had locked access to the controller’s employee data. Lacking decryption capabilities, the controller opted against system interference. Notably, the controller did not report this incident to the DPA, viewing it as falling outside the scope of a data protection breach defined by the GDPR. Despite losing access to digital records due to the ransomware, the Company insisted that data access was blocked, not lost. They argued that this did not constitute a data breach under the GDPR ), as internal analysis indicated that no external data transfer had occurred, thus not requiring notification. The supervisory authority noted that the controller’s compliance with administrative proceedings was less than ideal. There were instances of unsigned letters and unresponsive communication.
The Polish DPA's Decision
According to the Polish DPA, the Company has fallen short of its obligations related to data protection, particularly Articles 24(1), 25(1), 32(1)(b), and 32(2) of GPDR, as It failed to exhibit that it adequately assessed the level of security about the risks associated with data processing. T The controller’s selected security measures were proven insufficient, leaving its systems vulnerable to cyber-attacks like ransomware, a predicament that has unfortunately been realized in this case.
The evidence collected by the Polish DPA suggested that the company might have failed to conduct a proper risk analysis, which is essential for defining security measures. Without an accurate risk analysis, the implemented security measures may not align with the actual risks, increasing the probability of a breach.
In the Polish DPA's opinion, this was evident when the controller’s IT system, used for data processing, was compromised, leading to the encryption of stored data due to malware. The information provided by the Company regarding the security measures it has implemented could have been more organized and more organized, leaving it unclear whether these measures met the necessary standards. In this specific case, without needing an external audit, it is apparent that the controller’s security measures were inadequate. The scale of personal data processed by the company demanded high security, which needed to be met. This breach and the response to it demonstrated glaringly the inadequacy of the meassures introduced by the controller.
For the Polish DPA, security measures for ensuring data integrity and availability cannot be chosen arbitrarily. They must correspond to the nature of the data and the associated risks. Therefore, in light of this case, it is essential for companies to rigorously conduct risk analyses and implement robust security measures to safeguard personal data and comply with legal obligations effectively.
Moreover, the controller’s prior data backup protocols did not fulfil the requirements under Article 32(1)(b) and (c) of the GDPR, which requires ensuring constant availability of processing systems and services and the rapid restoration of personal data access in the event of an incident. The dialogue on security measures prompts a reminder: a controller's responsibility isn't confined to the initial establishment and implementation of data protection measures. Continuous verification of these measures is paramount, especially when personal data is processed electronically.
For the Polish DPA, the controller's inability to conclusively determine whether unauthorized access to the compromised data occurred, a palpable risk exists to the rights and freedoms of the affected individuals. The controller should have notified the DPA about the breach.
Taking above into consideration the Polish DPA decided to impose the fine on the controller in the amount of 47.160,- PLN (approx. € 10,000)
The whole decision is available here in Polish
Article provided by INPLP member: Xawery Konarski and Mateusz Kupiec (Traple Konarski Poderecki & Partners, Poland)
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- Mai 2024
- April 2024
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010