News
CJEU increases the requirements for claiming non-material damage within the meaning of the GDPR
Whether or not (nearly) any and all violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) entitles data subjects to non-material damages has been the subject of substantial debate. On 14 December 2023 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a first decision on this topic holding, that such damages may in principle be claimed for all violations, as the GDPR not only does not require a ‘de minimis threshold’, but even pre-cludes national legislation or a national practice which sets such threshold. This caused the data protection community to predict a wave of incoming data-protection related litigation. 1 month and 11 days later, this has changed yet again.

In its decision C 687/21 from 25 January 2024 the CJEU, among other things, held that the mere concern that a person’s personal data after a data breach could be misused is not sufficient for nonmaterial damage. Another important finding is that the controller can exonerate himself or herself if he or she can prove that appropriate technical and organisational measures within the meaning of the GDPR were otherwise taken despite the breach.
Facts
In the main proceeding, an employee of an electrical retailer inadvertently handed over both the device ordered by the applicant and the associated purchase and credit agreement with the applicant’s personal data to the wrong customer. The mistake was recognized immediately and the employee of the electrical retailer obtained the return of the device and the documents. About half an hour after the erroneous handover to the wrong customer, the aforementioned items were returned to the applicant.
The applicant then brought an action before the Hagen Local Court seeking compensation for the nonmaterial damage suffered. According to the applicant this damage resulted from the error made by the employee of the electrical retailer and the resulting risk of losing control of his personal data. The applicant relied, among other things, on the provisions of the GDPR.
Decision of the CJEU
The Hagen Local Court then referred several questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling.
In its decision, the Court held that unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, personal data by 'third parties' is not in itself sufficient for it to be held that the technical and organizational measures implemented by the controller were not ‘appropriate’ within the meaning of Articles 24 and 32 GDPR. Rather, the competent court must also take into account all evidence provided by the controller to demonstrate the adequacy of the technical and organisational measures adopted by him or her to comply with his or her obligations under Articles 24 and 32 GDPR.
It can therefore be concluded from the CJEU’s decision that data controllers can prove and exonerate themselves within the framework of the reversal of the burden of proof that, despite the breach, appropriate technical and organisational measures are in place and therefore no data protection breach has occurred.
Furthermore, the CJEU stated that, in principle, the data subject may suffer non-material damage within the meaning of Art 82 GDPR even in the event of a temporary loss of control over personal data.
However, the CJEU further held ‘[…] that it is for the applicant in an action for compensation under Article 82 of the GDPR to demonstrate the existence of such damage. In particular, a purely hypothetical risk of misuse by an unauthorised third party cannot give rise to compensation. This is so where no third party became aware of the personal data at issue.’
A purely hypothetical possibility of data misuse is therefore not sufficient to prove that the breach of the GDPR had negative consequences for the applicant.
Conclusion
With this decision, the CJEU therefore increases the requirements for the assertion of claims for damages and, de facto, thankfully sets a ‘de minimis threshold’ for such claims. A purely hypothetical risk of data misuse is thus not sufficient to assume non-material damage within the meaning of Art 82 GDPR. This can be of particular importance in practice, as it is often difficult to prove actual data misuse after a data leak whereas non-material damage is regularly claimed already based on the ‘fear’, that a misuse may happen. This, at least, will not be possible henceforward.
Link to the CJEU Decision:
https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=282062&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1
Article provided by INPLP member: Árpád Geréd (MGLP Rechtsanwälte, Austria)
Co-Author: Tamara Thirring
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- Jänner 2025
- Dezember 2024
- November 2024
- Oktober 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- Juli 2024
- Juni 2024
- Mai 2024
- April 2024
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010