News
The Data Protection Bill, Brexit and Data Transfers
The Data Protection Bill (Bill) will replace the Data Protection Act 1998 and will implement the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) into the law of England and Wales. The Bill is currently undergoing legislative review in the House of Lords (the upper house of the United Kingdom parliament).
Purposes of the Bill
The Bill performs two core functions.
- The Bill will implement the GDPR into the law of England and Wales and sets out the United Kingdom's derogations under the GDPR.
- The Bill will ensure that at the point the United Kingdom exits the European Union the United Kingdom will have a data protection regime which is largely aligned with that of the remaining European Union member states.
Brexit
Following the referendum of 23 June 2016 and the United Kingdom's subsequent notification under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, the United Kingdom's membership of the European Union is due to end on 29 March 2019, subject to any transitional or implementation period that may be agreed with the European Union (and ratified by its continuing member states).
Third country status and international transfers
At the point that the United Kingdom exits the European Union it will for the purposes of the GDPR become a third country. Therefore, transfers of personal data from a European member state to the United Kingdom will engage the provisions of the GDPR relating to the transfer of personal data to third countries (Chapter V). Organisations in European member states will still be able to transfer personal data to the United Kingdom, however, such transfers will need to meet the requirements of the GDPR in relation to transfers of personal data outside of the European Economic Area.
Transfers on the basis of a decision of adequacy
The optimum position for the United Kingdom post-Brexit would be to obtain and maintain a decision of the European Commission that the laws of the United Kingdom provide an adequate level of protection for the rights of data subjects whose data are transferred to the United Kingdom.
A decision of adequacy would remove the need for an organisation which transfers personal data to the United Kingdom to rely on compliance mechanisms to ensure such transfers meet the requirements of the GDPR (for example, Standard Contractual Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules). Implementing such compliance mechanisms requires organisations to invest additional time and expenditure which will inevitably reduce the ease with which personal data can currently be transferred from mainland Europe to the United Kingdom.
Maintaining a decision of adequacy
The Bill will help to align the data protection regimes of the United Kingdom and the European Union on day one following Brexit, however, it does not guarantee that the European Union will recognise the adequacy of the United Kingdom's data protection regime. Two decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union << Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen (C‑203/15) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and others (C 698/15) >> illustrate Europe's concerns regarding elements of the United Kingdom's privacy regime. The CJEU held that the Investigatory Powers Act did not comply with the requirements of European Union Law.
Furthermore, decisions of the United Kingdom's courts could cause national data protection law to diverge from the GDPR which could prevent a finding of adequacy or call into question a finding of adequacy granted by the European Commission.
Mind the gap
The United Kingdom's exit from the European Union is unprecedented and shrouded in uncertainty. We cannot be certain as to the length of time it will take for the European Commission to grant the United Kingdom a decision of adequacy, if at all.
In theory, post-Brexit, it is conceivable that the United Kingdom could be without a decision of adequacy for a significant period of time and that organisations would need to implement appropriate GDPR compliant safeguards to facilitate the cross-channel flow of personal data.
Challenges to Standard Contractual Clauses
Standard Contractual Clauses would appear to be the natural fall-back position for organisations in the absence of an adequacy decision. However, the future of the Standard Contractual Clauses remains uncertain given that the validity of the Standard Contractual Clauses has been called into question by Data Protection Commission v Facebook & Schrems.
Preparing for uncertain times ahead
It is impossible for organisations to foresee every scenario that may arise in connection with the cross-channel transfer of personal data but it does not mean that organisations cannot take simple practical steps.
- Identify existing agreements which will be in force beyond March 2019 and concern the transfer of personal data between the European Union and the United Kingdom. Consider remediating such agreements to includes provisions and mechanisms to facilitate the transfer of personal data in the event that the United Kingdom is not subject to a decision of adequacy.
- When entering into agreements which will be in force beyond March 2019 organisations should ensure that such agreements contain provisions which will enable the transfer of personal data in compliance with the requirements of the GDPR irrespective of whether the United Kingdom obtains a decision of adequacy.
Article provided by: Matthew Harris (Womble Bond Dickinson)
Discover more about the Cloud Privacy Check(CPC) / Data Privacy Compliance(DPC) project
Director CPC project: Dr. Tobias Höllwarth, tobias.hoellwarth@eurocloud.org
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010