News
Unauthorized Processing of Personal Data in Connection with a Traffic Accident
The Slovak Office for Personal Data Protection (hereinafter referred to as the “Office”) recently imposed a fine of EUR 7,500 on Company CC for repeated and serious violations of data protection rules under the GDPR. Company CC, which focuses on compensating traffic accident participants, unlawfully collected and processed personal data without a proper legal basis and subsequently contacted these individuals with service offers. This case underscores the importance of lawful and transparent processing of personal data.
The Office’s investigation of this case began following a complaint from the data subject, who claimed that they received a letter from Company CC identifying them as a participant in a traffic accident. The data subject had never owned a motor vehicle nor held a driver’s license and was therefore surprised to find that Company CC was handling their personal data. The letter contained their first name, surname, address, and the accident date, raising questions about the origin of the data and the reasons for Company CC’s processing. When the data subject attempted to contact Company CC to seek an explanation of how the company obtained their personal data, they received only vague and contradictory responses. According to Company CC, the data originated either from publicly available sources or was reported by neighbors.
The Office then requested that Company CC provide a legal basis for processing the data subject’s personal data. Company CC, however, was unable to provide the required evidence, leading to an inspection directly at its premises. The inspection uncovered significant deficiencies in the company’s data processing practices—Company CC had not ensured even the basic requirements for lawful and transparent processing of personal data and lacked any documentation to demonstrate compliance with GDPR.
The inspection highlighted three primary areas in which Company CC violated GDPR:
1. Violation of the Principle of Lawfulness
Company CC processed personal data, such as the first name, surname, address, and accident date, without a demonstrable legal basis, which contravenes Article 6 of the GDPR. Processing personal data requires satisfying at least one of the conditions listed in this article (such as the data subject’s consent or a legitimate interest). Company CC did not possess any of these legal grounds.
2. Violation of the Principle of Transparency
GDPR mandates data controllers to provide data subjects with clear and understandable information about how and why their personal data is processed. However, in the letters sent to data subjects, Company CC did not inform recipients of the purpose or legal basis for processing their personal data, thus breaching the transparency principle set out in Article 5 of the GDPR.
3. Lack of Accountability and Absence of Records
GDPR requires that data controllers maintain records of processing activities to enable oversight and demonstrate GDPR compliance. However, Company CC lacked records or other documents related to personal data processing, which is a violation of Article 30 of the GDPR.
Based on these findings, the Office ordered Company CC to immediately cease unlawful data processing and delete the personal data of data subjects from all internal databases. Furthermore, Company CC was instructed to inform the Office of compliance with these measures within 15 days of the decision becoming final. Given the extent and seriousness of the infringements, the Office also imposed a financial penalty. The fine was set at EUR 7,500, considering it was a repeated violation. Previously, the Office had already mandated measures to improve data protection at Company CC, which it failed to implement. Although the fine is at the lower limit of possible sanctions under Article 83 of the GDPR, the Office considers it sufficient to serve as a deterrent.
The Office’s decision sets a significant precedent and should serve as a warning to all data controllers. Unauthorized handling of data, without a legal basis and without transparency toward data subjects, can result in severe legal and financial consequences. Through this decision, the Office emphasized that any data processing must be grounded in one of the legal bases listed in the GDPR, from the start of processing through to its conclusion. The Office’s commitment to conducting inspections and rigorously sanctioning non-compliance demonstrates that failing to adhere to GDPR can have serious implications for companies. The case of Company CC, therefore, illustrates that in today’s digital world, data protection must be part of responsible business practices and that data protection authorities monitor compliance not only formally but in all practical aspects.
Article provided by INPLP member: Miroslav Chlipala (BCH Advokáti Chlipala, Slovakia)
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- November 2024
- Oktober 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- Juli 2024
- Juni 2024
- Mai 2024
- April 2024
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010